首页> 外文OA文献 >On LTE-WiFi Coexistence and Inter-Operator Spectrum Sharing in Unlicensed Bands: Altruism, Cooperation and Fairness
【2h】

On LTE-WiFi Coexistence and Inter-Operator Spectrum Sharing in Unlicensed Bands: Altruism, Cooperation and Fairness

机译:论无牌带中的LTE-WiFi共存和运营商间频谱共享:利他主义,合作与公平

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The coexistence of LTE-Unlicensed (LTE-U) and WiFi in unlicensed spectrum is studied in the context of airtime sharing. We consider core problem where a set of LTE-U cells from different operators share the same channel as a co-located WiFi access point (AP). We assume that LTE-U cells utilize Listen-Before-Talk (LBT) as the default channel access mechanism. Principally, we deal with the following question: how should an operator’s LTE-U cell adjust its contention window in order to provide a fair coexistence both with WiFi and co-located LTE-U cells of other operators? We consider that LTE-U cells behave altruistically both among themselves and to WiFi. Cooperation of LTE-U cells is studied using a coalition formation game framework which is based on the well-known Shapley value. We define a payoff configuration scheme in the coalition game which involves altruism. We prove that the coalitional game is always zero-monotonic, and Shapley value is also max-min fair. We compare airtime sharing performance of Shapley value with weighted proportional fairness via numerical results and show that Shapley value provides much better fairness than proportional fairness as determined by entropy and Jain’s index metrics while having roughly equal average airtime.
机译:在通话时间共享的背景下,研究了未经许可的LTE(LTE-U)和WiFi在未经许可的频谱中的共存。我们考虑的核心问题是,来自不同运营商的一组LTE-U小区与位于同一地点的WiFi接入点(AP)共享同一信道。我们假设LTE-U小区使用先听后听(LBT)作为默认的信道访问机制。原则上,我们处理以下问题:运营商的LTE-U小区应如何调整其竞争窗口,以与其他运营商的WiFi和共置的LTE-U小区实现公平的共存?我们认为LTE-U小区在它们之间以及对WiFi都是利他的。使用基于众所周知的Shapley值的联盟形成博弈框架研究LTE-U小区的协作。我们在涉及利他主义的联盟游戏中定义了收益配置方案。我们证明了联盟博弈始终是零单调的,而Shapley值也是最大-最小公平的。我们通过数值结果将Shapley值与加权比例公平性的通话时间共享性能进行了比较,结果表明,与熵和Jain指数指标确定的比例公平性相比,Shapley值提供的公平性要好得多,而平均通话时间则大致相等。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号